Category: Idle Speculation

Idle Speculator: Payrolls, Policies, Politics

 

Friday morning’s report on the employment situation had a little bit for everyone, bulls and bears alike. November revisions saw the first positive month for payroll growth since the current recession began, and the “less bad” trend remains firmly intact. However, the number of discouraged workers jumped dramatically, and payroll growth is still far too low to significantly bring the unemployment rate to a persistently lower level. While unemployment continues to pose a risk to Democrats in 2010, neither party is making a compelling offer to the electorate at the moment, and both of them are too focused on scapegoating the other. While we expect some positive economic surprises in 2010, the U.S. electorate and economy will remain stuck between an elephant and a donkey for some time.

Continue reading: http://symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20100112.pdf

Idle Speculator: Is the Federal Government Too Tight?

In our latest Idle Speculator piece, we ask whether — despite large recent and expected budget deficits — the federal government risks being too tight. We argue that:

(1) At certain times and under certain economic conditions, deficit financed improvements in the tax code and public expenditures and investments make sense.

(2) The U.S. may be in one of those periods now, while Japan may be exiting one. In both cases (as well as the Great Depression), demographic trends might be playing a larger role than conventional theories assume.

(3) Pro-growth fiscal policies would give the Federal Reserve a lot more room to raise rates and defend the USD.

(4) Given: the enormous nominal dollar figures attached to discussions of U.S. budget deficits and national debt; widespread misconceptions about public finance and its economic effects; and ideological rancor among voters and politicians; there will be increasing pressure to tighten up the federal budget in coming years. Such actions could be premature and threaten a nascent economic recovery.

http://symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20091109.pdf

The Ascendance (and Continuing Ignorance) of Risk

We’ve posted a new Idle Speculator Piece, in which we observe that increased attention is – quite naturally – being paid to risk and risk management, and discuss recent risk related developments in the domains of health insurance and financial regulation. Our conclusion is that, while risk  is garnering plenty of attention, it seems unlikely at present that substantive, well designed risk management measures will follow.

http://symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/2009062501.pdf

Idle Speculator Piece: Now What???

We’ve posted a new Idle Speculator piece on the recent week long stock market thrashing, and some potential contributing factors. We still believe that the safest and surest way out of this crisis, beyond a smart strategy for supporting recapitalization of the financial sector, is to optimize the policy mix. Unfortunately, that idea is getting precious little play at the moment, seemingly because so few policymakers understand it; instead, the political logjam still centers around philosophical differences over the ownership of income and allocation of capital.

The basic idea behind an optimal policy mix is that the federal government must ease up on the private sector thru smarter taxes and regulations, so that (1) the economy can return to a growth path, and (2) the Federal Reserve can put its focus where it belongs, on keeping the purchasing power of the dollar reasonably stable, and the interests of debtors and creditors in balance. Until something like that is on the horizon, broad stock markets will have to fall a good bit further for us to become bullish on them for anything beyond a trading range bounce. To reiterate, we do see a historic number of compelling values lying around – but the broad U.S. stock markets, although more attractively priced than a year ago, are still not among them, even now.

http://symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20090224_What_Now.pdf 

Political Winds: Stimulus, Pelosi, Jindal

The stimulus bill has apparently been agreed to by both chambers of Congress and should be passed this week for President Obama’s signature. The program isn’t perfect (they never are), but for its size, it was developed expeditiously. The new Administration can view that as a victory, and it will stand to benefit from perceptions of its effectiveness – which of course requires that it has some positive impact. On that point, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the plan will add 1.2 to 3.6 million jobs, and increase GDP by 1.1-3.3%. Not bad, but keep in mind that GDP is now expected to contract by over 4% in the first quarter of 2009, and much of the stimulus in this bill won’t kick in right away. It’s still going to be a long, tough haul, and in our view, without fundamental tax reform and long term USD stability, the happy days, when they return, will be a tad more doleful, and a bit less gleeful.

The stimulus bill can also be seen as a victory for the Senate. It’s reported (by CNN and NY Times, via US News and World Report’s Political Bulletin) that House Leader Pelosi was ticked off by an allegedly premature announcement of an agreement on the bill by Sen Reid. We pointed out that President Obama could have his hands full with House Dems – it remains to be seen whether he’s brought them to heel, or whether they’ll demand their pounds of flesh in the sessions ahead.

Finally, AP (also via US News and World Report Political Bulletin) reported that Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal will deliver the GOP’s counter point to President Obama’s first speech to Congress on 2/24. Cynics might argue that Jindal’s selection, along with the election of Michael Steele to head the GOP, is evidence of a strategy to present candidates who are more richly tinted than, say, Dick Cheney. But Jindal is a very competent and popular governor, as well as a charismatic speaker  – for a Republican, anyways. If nominated for the presidency in 2012, would he be a strong enough match for Obama? We think that would only happen if the new President’s political capital has suffered significantly via economic malaise (which could well happen, as it did with President Carter) and/or some other significant and unexpected development(s). Otherwise, Obama will be a tough match for the GOP in 2012.

Our “Wha’ppened?!?” for 2/10/09

We’ve posted an analysis of yesterday’s steep market sell off at http://www.symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20090211.pdf. All of our Idle Speculator pieces are available online at http://symmetrycapital.net/index.php/idle-speculator/.

SCM’s 2009 Outlook Now Available

Our 2009 Outlook (and 2008 Postmortem) are now available online at http://symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20090209.pdf. All of our Idle Speculator pieces are available at http://symmetrycapital.net/index.php/idle-speculator.

‘Frightening’ Trend in Gold

In another echo of the 1970s, Bloomberg reported that the chairman of Barrick Gold Corp sees a "frightening" trend toward higher gold prices. 

Barrick Gold Corp. Chairman Peter Munk said an “unpleasant and frightening” trend of investors buying gold as protection against uncertainty in world markets may help push the metal over $1,000 an ounce.

Munk, founder of Toronto-based Barrick, the world’s largest gold producer, said he has received an increasing number of calls from wealthy investors looking for ways to buy bullion. While that is positive for the metal market, it is a “sad part of a civilized society,” Munk said.

“That’s not where you want to be, it’s alarming,” he said today in an interview from Davos, Switzerland, where he is attending the World Economic Forum. “Do I personally believe gold will break through $1,000? It’s not a question of if, it’s a question of how soon.”

As the article points out, this may be good news for holders of gold and claims on gold production, but it is decidedly troublesome for the global economy. This is primarily because it implies rising inflation and falling financial asset values in the years ahead. We made this point to clients in our 2009 Outlook, which will be posted on our public website shortly (2/9/09 – now available at http://www.symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20090209.pdf). If there is any benefit to rising inflation, it’s that debtors will see their debt service burden fall in real terms. Unfortunately, this is only true for those who are able to stay afloat as inflation takes hold, and it means a corresponding loss for creditors, who will demand greater compensation for risk taking in the future, all else equal.

By our reckoning, gold north of $1,000 would imply an annual inflation rate of 4 to 6% in the next one to two years, as things now stand. Added to a 7 to 8% unemployment rate, you get a Misery Index (unemployment rate plus inflation rate) of 11 to 14%. However, if gold repeats its bubble performance of the 1970s, the Misery Index could go much higher. Back then, when all was said and done, gold settled at a level ten times higher than it had been in the early 1960s. Conservatively, that would put gold at $2,500 to $3,500 per ounce today, which would almost certainly signal double digit inflation in the years to come. And based on our prediction that unemployment could peak at 11-12%, the Misery Index could exceed 20%, perhaps even surpassing its June 1980 high of 22%.

Some analysts and economists argue that inflation is ‘good’ for stocks, at least over the longer term. However, under our regression-derived models, a gold price of $2500/oz would imply 400-500 on the S&P 500, a decline of 40-50% from current levels, while $3500/oz would call for a value of 200-300 on the S&P 500, a decline of 65 to 75% from current levels. A gold price of $1500/oz would imply an S&P 500 value of 600-650. Let’s hope that Chairman Munk’s forecast for gold is overly bullish. If not, we’d expect the Misery Index to rise and stock market indices to fall.

URLs:

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601082&sid=aXiv1sHNjvsk&refer=canada# 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Misery_index_(economics) 

http://www.miseryindex.us/ 

http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/08/15/business/mcolumn16.php 

 

It’s the Policy Mix, Stupid!

Our latest ‘Idle Speculator’ piece outlines the causes and potential effects of the financial crisis, and more importantly, the optimal direction for public policy in coming years.

Be warned, it’s a long piece. However, I segregated much of the wonkish and tangential stuff in footnotes. If you skip those, it shouldn’t take too long to read.

We welcome your comments and feedback. Please feel free to share this with anyone that you think might be interested.

URLs: 

http://www.symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20080925_policy_mix.pdf

http://www.symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation.htm 

Idle Speculator: Huckabee and Obama

Please see our latest Idle Speculator piece, an assessment of the Obama and Huckabee victories in Iowa and their respective tax platforms: http://www.symmetrycapital.net/idlespeculation/20080104.pdf

Further reading:

Alan Fram of Associated Press reports that Huckabee’s supporters were overwhelmingly driven by religious motives, and that Obama was helped by turnout among younger voters: http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hWo9LoUnPeka7_l2cOeaLRisAJ5gD8TV5IJ80

The Economist’s take, "A call for change", is available at http://www.economist.com/daily/news/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10473364&top_story=1 

CSM also sees the results as an endorsement of political change: http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0104/p25s03-uspo.html 

NPR looks ahead to New Hampshire: http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=17844497